"HAPPY HOLIDAYS"

In what has become a seasonal ritual, that putrescent wad of flesh and excrement which was molded into human form and given life via a direct infusion of hate and ignorance in liquid concentrate form (you might know him as "Bill O'Reilly") is leading the charge of right-wing pundits and aggrieved Christians over the hill -- lances sharpened, swords glinting, mouths drooling, brains flat-lining -- to defend Christmas against the all-powerful atheistic liberal orthodoxy that seeks to eradicate it.

To which I say, Silly Thumpers, it's not Christmas we want to get rid of, it's Christianity. And we will, just you wait! Bwaaa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha.. (rubs hands together malignly)

Seriously, though, I have zero patience with this crap. It's not that I don't hold school administrators who rename Christmas Trees "Holiday Trees" in contempt -- I do -- it's just that they're a trivial annoyance compared with the much larger mass of Jeebus-loving imbeciles out there who feed their persecution complexes on non-controversies like this.

That having been said, I do have a question about the phrase "Happy Holidays". I've seen repeated assertions that this phrase is intended as a "PC" version of "Merry Christmas" that's meant to be more "inclusive" of Jews and other non-Christians. Yet that's not how I intend the phrase at all. For as long as I can remember, I've used the phrase "Happy Holidays" as a simple short-hand to wish somebody "Merry Christmas" and "Happy New Year". I mean, you've got two major holidays only a week apart, right? Makes good practical sense to use a single "wish" that encompasses them both. Am I the only person who understands the phrase in this way?


SAINTS 21 - JETS 19

I'll be honest: At this point, with the season down the toilet, under the lip, and on its way to the sewage treatment plant, this was probably about the best outcome a Jets fan could hope for. They actually played OK. Brooks Bollinger, who posted a 107.9 QB rating, has raised his game to the level of Serviceable Backup. Kicker Mike Nugent got a bunch of opportunities (yeah, OK, so the last one was a bit short). And in the end, the learning experience didn't set us back any in the Leinart/Bush Sweepstakes.

Low Point of the Game: Lavernaeus Coles' TD catch in the second quarter getting called back. That was a catch, pure and simple. The replay showed Coles with the ball firmly in both hands while in the end zone. He took several steps with it, then it popped out when his elbow hit the ground after his knee was down. Seriously: How is that not a touchdown? Idiot officials.

High Point of the Game: Awe-Inspiring, Indestructible, Green-and-White Warrior Curtis Martin became only the fourth player in NFL history to break the 14,000-yards rushing mark. Go, Curtis, Go. (And a big Fuck You to Jimmy Johnson who, on FOX NFL Sunday, said that the Jets need Reggie Bush because "Curtis Martin is finished". Yeah, he's real finished you clueless dickwad. I'll remind you of that after he eclipses 1000 yards for the eleventh straight season.)


28

Curtis Martin is fucking cool.


WEEKEND BEER BLOGGING

While hunting for beer options for this weekend, Tracy espied Flying Dog's Gonzo Imperial Porter. Examining the exterior of the four-pack, she quickly learned that this brew was a tribute to the late Hunter S. Thompson ("gonzo" journalist). She then further discovered two flavor scales, one of which indicated that this beer was very dark, and a second which placed it well towards the malty end of the spectrum. Her hop-o-phobia thus assuaged and her interest piqued by the association with the venerable Mr. Thompson, Tracy prevailed upon me to make this our selection for the week. (OK, she didn't have to twist my arm too hard.)

My impressions: This is an aggressive but somewhat one-dimensional porter. The texture is chewy and kind of coats your tongue. Long, long aftertaste. The kind of long I could still be tasting tomorrow morning. The flavor is intensely smoky. Not quite Someone-Put-A-Cigar-Out-In-This smoky, but awfully close. Despite the advertised maltiness, any sweet overtones this beer might have are overwhelmed by the charbroiled taste. Very mildly hopped. Most of the time you won't notice the hops at all, because you'll be preoccupied with chewing the embers before you swallow them, but every now and then the hops will poke through and strafe the side of your tongue a bit. Overall I'd say this particular porter is intense, edgy, imbalanced, and a little over-the-top. Definitely grabs your attention out of the gate, but I can see it becoming tiresome pretty quickly. Best in small doses. Hey, sounds like a certain writer you might be acquainted with...

(Tracy says: "That must be why they sell it in four packs.")

Rating: 5.5

That's right! That's right! It's a Weekend Beer Blogging Two-Fer! Yeah, Baby! And to what do you owe this pleasure, you ask? I'll tell you what: The MONSTER is in the hizZouse!!!

The first snow has fallen here in the Shire, heralding the arrival of Winter -- real Winter as opposed to "calendar" Winter (now there's a SSTAM post just waiting to be written) -- and what is Winter if not the time to sip from that most exquisite sub-species of genus Beerus, the Barley Wines? Ah, yes, here they come to a packie near you: Sweet, silky smooth, and ready to Kick. Your. Ass.

First up this season is an old friend, Brooklyn Brewing's Monster Ale. I almost missed it today as I scanned the racks, but, just as I was about to turn away, there it was, it's mylar label winking at me from the bottom corner of the domestic microbrew section. Immediately, I was transported into reverie. Ah, Monster, I remember when we first met. It was our mutual friend, Hank, who introduced us. I was having a football party at my spankin' new bachelor pad, and he was kind enough to bring a six-pack of you along for the fun. Somehow, in the excitement, I missed the informative blurb on your packaging that read "11% alcohol by volume". So it was that, after imbibing the better part of the aforementioned six-pack, I missed several other things, including the AFC Championship game and the pizza we had ordered. Ah, Monster. Good times.

A word of warning to those who don't already know: Barley wines are an acquired taste. Starting from the swill that Americans know as mass-produced domestic lagers, a barley wine could be seen as a third cousin, twice removed. A good barley wine has a stronger spiritual kinship to a single-malt Scotch than it does to, say, Budweiser. The barley wine is no casual beverage. It is to be sipped. Slowly. It requires -- nay, it demands -- your attention.

Monster is an absolutely splendid spokesman for the family. It has the silky texture that comes from the ultra-subtle carbonation that characterizes the type. It has a sweet and heady aroma. There is a strong enough suggestion of hops to remind you that you are, in fact, drinking beer. And there is the kick. The kick that says a high-octane alcoholic beverage is en-route to your gastrointestinal system. Ah yes, while Monster is not nearly as overwhelming in this regard as other barley wines, it does let you know who's in charge. Firmly. No talking back.

If you are a beer aficionado, you absolutely need to give Monster a try. If you're a casual beer drinker looking for a little adventure, then for you, my friend, this qualifies as Living on the Edge.

Rating: 9.0


HAPPY THANKSGIVING

Thanksgiving, as I believe I noted last year, is my favorite holiday. Copious amounts of hearty food. Booze flowing freely. Catching up with the family. Football. And no stinkin' religious pretense lurking in the background.

Ah, but isn't it called Thanksgiving for a reason? Who are we giving thanks to, huh, smartass?

In answer to that, I give you Toast's Prayer to the First Replicator:

Let us pray:
Thanks be to thee, First Replicator
By the grace of evolution and the wonder of natural selection
Your clever chemical bindings and unbindings have brought forth
Both the company at this table
And the bountiful repast we see before us
All praise is due to thee
Who lives on within us to this very day

Hey, it's a start. I promise to refine it in successive years.

Happy Thanksgiving, everyone. May you have a happy and safe holiday. Keep the fires warm and the beer flowing.


REPEAL THE SEX TAX!!!

Salkowitz: Brilliant.

The risk of incurring the cost and complication of childbirth every time one engages in sexual activity constitutes a powerful incentive – a sex tax, if you wish – to discourage activity that sexphobes oppose. If you see things this way, then the entire project of reproductive rights, not merely abortion, is a profound threat because it promises a repeal of the sex tax and a repudiation of the whole underlying moralistic policy.

I would have changed that to "faux-moralistic", but that's just me. Anyhow, go read.


CHRIS WHITLEY: 1960-2005

Singer Chris Whitley died today of lung cancer at the age of 45.

Whitley was a hard guy to pin down, musically. Let's just say that he lived in a tent beside the intersection of the great roads connecting the cities of Rock N' Roll, Country, and Folk. He wasn't from any of those places, though, that's for sure. He kept only the bare necessities with him.

Whitley's 1991 album Living With The Law is absolutely brilliant.

It's also the first album that Tracy ever played for me. It was a few weeks after we'd started going out. We were sitting together in her apartment, drinking Drambuie and talking, and she asked if she could play something for me. Next thing I know, this haunting, soulful sound is emanating from Tracy's girl-stereo over in the corner. I was hooked on the album immediately. It had great Mood, great imagery. I found it calming. Entrancing even. I highly recommend it.

Tracy was (and remains) "proud" of Chris Whitley's place in her collection. For her, he was that rarity that all music fans treasure: The artist you discover all by yourself, that nobody else knows about. It's a cool feeling, and I'll always remember how happy she was to share her find with me.

Chris Whitley: You will be missed.


ON HEDONISM

Took the "What Philosophy Do You Follow?" Quiz that Shakes (Existentialist) linked to on Monday and Kate (Utilitarian) linked to yesterday.

Here are my results:

You scored as Hedonism. Your life is guided by the principles of Hedonism: You believe that pleasure is a great, or the greatest, good; and you try to enjoy life's pleasures as much as you can.

"Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die!"

Hedonism

100%

Existentialism

95%

Justice (Fairness)

75%

Kantianism

70%

Utilitarianism

65%

Strong Egoism

40%

Nihilism

20%

Apathy

5%

Divine Command

0%

You know, considering how goofy and arbitrary these internet quizzes typically are, that's actually a pretty accurate picture of yours truly. For starters, all the elements where I scored higher than 50% actually are elements of my moral belief system and all the ones where I scored less than 50% are not. So kudos to Wikipedia user Arocoun, who designed it.

It's funny. Most of the moral philosophy I remember reading (I minored in the subject in college) talked about moral belief systems as something that one develops over time. Kohlberg, in particular, dedicated his entire career to identifying and codifying a system of "stages" of moral development that people progress through. It's literally true, of course, that each individual's sense of morality and ideas about what is "good" change over time, so I guess you can call that "development". Whether it's "progress" -- whether we become "more moral" or our moral belief systems become more "refined" as we move through life -- well, that strikes me as a Your Mileage May Vary situation. I suspect a lot of people just become bigger assholes as they get older. Just a hunch.

Looking back on my life so far -- and rudely extrapolating from my sample size of One to all the rest of you -- the process of moral "development" strikes me as less of a building up than a stripping away.

You're born. In a short span of years your society, culture, religion, family and peers dump a truckload of stuff on top of you with the label "MORALS" stenciled across it. Then you spend the rest of your life digging out, slowly, painstakingly evaluating all these ideas, tossing away the ones that don't make sense and keeping only those that do. Some people lack the intellectual curiosity and/or introspective nature the task requires, and so they stay buried under the pile. Others escape into the fresh, bullshit-free air. Many make it halfway, discarding a lot but remaining forever burdened with a few tokens of their upbringing. (I still have a hypertrophied sense of guilt, courtesy of my Catholic upbringing, that I carry around like a mental rabbit's foot.)

Here, then, are the chips and shards that I have removed from the spare-yet-beautiful sculpture that I call my moral system:

  • There is no God. Well, OK, strictly speaking I cannot prove that, so let's just say that I do not believe in God and I strongly suspect that there is, in fact, no God. It took fifteen years for my science education and overall intellectual development to reach a point where I could look at the religion of my childhood and say "This is just silly. This is no different from Santa Claus, it's just that for some reason no one's letting me in on the gag this time." Having kicked God to the curb, I was freed from the notion that He was the Giver of Moral Rules. (Hence the 0% on "Divine Command")

  • There is no afterlife in which we are rewarded or punished for our actions during life. The universe is what it is, and there's nothing "outside" of it, no place where our "souls" -- which also don't exist -- go to be punished by God (which is good because we've already established that He doesn't exist). Ultimately, the lack of an afterlife means that people, if they're clever enough, can get away with doing bad things and never be punished. And once you realize this, you realize that morality cannot be based on fear of punishment or retribution. The impetus to act in a moral fashion comes from an internal recognition of a given course of action as The Right Thing To Do.

  • Morality has nothing in particular to do with Sex. This is the fragment of popularly-accepted moral belief that I chipped off of my own belief system with unmitigated glee and hurled with great force as far away as I could. What an utterly ridiculous notion it is to suppose that a particular sexual act can somehow be intrinsically immoral. Or that having sex with someone prior to having the community plonk their stamp of approval on the relationship (i.e. Marriage) is somehow "immoral". Preposterous. All the (typically) religiously-driven mania about Sex Sex Sex that masquerades as concern for moral standards in our culture is the biggest steaming pile of shit ever. It is the prime exemplar of False Morality.

  • There are no "victimless" immoral acts. This was really an extension and generalization of the realization about sex above. All of the catalogs of arbitrary restrictions that different religions and cultures maintain -- what you can eat, what you can do on particular days of the week, what words you can say -- are just plain goofy. The moral value of a given act cannot be measured in the abstract mechanics of the act itself. It can only be found in the intentions of the actor, the range of probable results of the action, and the actual results of the action.

  • Morality does not exist outside of us. It's a human construct. For that matter, meaning and purpose do not exist outside of us. Also purely human constructs. (Existentialism 95%) One side effect of this realization was that it lead me to eschew any notion that we have a "moral obligation" to fulfill some "purpose" in life beyond doing whatever brings us happiness.

What, then, after stripping away the notions above, was I left with? Well, it basically amounts to:

"Be excellent to each other."

And of course:

"Party on, Dude!"

This is no joke. No siree. I'm as serious as a heart attack. In fact, I'm thinking book deal: "Everything I Ever Really Needed to Know I Learned From Bill & Ted" has a certain ring to it. But I digress.

Be excellent to each other: We are bound by the material and temporal limitations of our bodies. Or, put differently, you're only goin' once around the ride. On the other hand, we are completely unbound by any external, non-human, supernaturally-imposed absolute rules. We are each free to create meaning and purpose in our lives as we see fit. A superior "morality" therefore consists in a set of principles that affords each of us the creative space in our lives to build that meaning and fulfill that potential. One such principle is that we should mitigate or eliminate, as much and as often as possible, the harm we do to others. Why, you say? Why not run rough-shod over everyone else in our quest for fulfillment? I think this was captured best by John Nash -- well, the character "John Nash", at least -- in A Beautiful Mind when he said (loosely paraphrasing) "An individual can best maximize his own advantage by acting to advance both his own interest and the interests of all others in the group." (I really wish I could find this line. I think it relates to the Nash Equilibrium, but I'm not sure.) Of course, if game theory and mathematics don't work for you, Audioslave capture this idea equally well:

Well if you set your mind upon it
I know that you can
You've got everything you wanted
You've done everything you planned
So let me make an offer
I'm only trying to help
You can make your load
Just a little lighter
All you got to do is share the wealth

Party on, Dude! Really, if that's not an exhortation to Hedonism, what is? Again: Once around the ride. A couple of billion years -- give or take -- after the First Replicator came into existence, the immutable laws of evolution and natural selection have burped me out into the Cosmos. I am here for less than a blink of eye, and then I'm gone. In that span, it would be insane -- no, wait, I'll cut to the chase -- it would be immoral to not seek to enjoy life's pleasures. And no, that doesn't mean I need to own a yacht or a 747 or have ten houses with two Jacuzzis each. It simply means that in whatever situation I find myself, I should seek pleasure and avoid pain. No no no, not even that, because sometimes pain can be fun. It means I should seek to luxuriate in every experience and avoid being dead before my time -- being a zombie.

This, then, is my Hedonistic Moral Imperative: To spend nights wrapped up on the couch with my beautiful wife, playing games, entertaining ourselves, engaging in all manner of mental and physical stimulation. To eat rich and wonderful foods. To drink deeply of intoxicating spirits. Also: To climb mountains, to ride my bike until I'm going to drop, to earn my black belt. And also: To never stop developing my mind -- not because I have to, but because it's fun. And also: To deepen my relationships with my friends and share in their experiences, because not everything that is to be enjoyed has to happen directly to me, sharing is also a pleasure, maybe the greatest one there is.

That's my morality.


SHOVE IT, DICK

Day Two of Operation American Freedom is in full swing, it appears.

Yesterday Bush burped up a bunch of mealy-mouthed crap about how he really didn't have any problem with people questioning his decision making with regard to Iraq and how -- heavens no! -- he never meant to impugn the patriotism of war critics. Now, today, Dick Cheney is saying that debating the Iraq war is just good, wholesome democracy at its best:

US Vice-President Dick Cheney has said he does not believe it is wrong for opponents to criticize American policy on Iraq and the War on Terror.

"Disagreement, argument and debate are the essentials of democracy" Mr Cheney told a Washington think-tank.

Please stop before I vomit.

Sorry, Dick, but you can shove that olive branch straight up your ass. You've been sliming your critics as traitors or worse since the moment the planes slammed into the twin towers. It's way too late in the game for this pathetic, transparently self-serving attempt to sanction an honest, open debate. Just because the polls have you a little spooked doesn't mean we're suddenly going to buy the idea that you're interested in the democratic process.


TALABANI?

I don't know how this slipped by me before, but Iraq's president is named Jalal Talabani?

Kind of an unfortunate name, no?


BEAVIS & BUTT-HEAD

Toilet humor. Inane, incessant laughter. Slap-stick violence. Hair Metal. I can't count how many times Mike Judge employed these instruments to devastating effect, leaving me doubled over on my couch. Granted, I was an easy mark. Just a simple "Shut up, assmunch! (WHACK!)" was all it took to reduce me to tears. Hell, a good imitation of The Butt-head Laugh still starts me giggling like an idiot eight years after the show went off the air. "The Simpsons" and "South Park" are fine, sure, but in my heart I'll always be a "Beavis and Butt-head" guy. They touched my Inner Dumbass in a way no one else ever could.

So it's understandable, I think, that I was filled with disgust today as I read Dana Stevens' review of the new Beavis & Butt-head anthology, Beavis and Butt-Head: The Mike Judge Collection in Slate. Not because Stevens wrote a negative review of the show. No. That would have been more merciful. What Stevens did was to write a positive review that comes off as both pompous and humorless.

Surely that's impossible, you say. The climb from the valley of Cornholio to the top of Mount Pomposity is too steep, too severe, even for a writer working at Slate!

Ah, but you forget, my friends: 9-11 changed everything:

The high-school burnouts Beavis and Butt-Head... are sublimely passive losers, both products and harbingers of the end-of-history anomie of the mid-'90s. It's impossible to imagine a post-9/11 Beavis and Butt-Head. Not because the show was devoid of political content but because the world it so ruthlessly satirized, a suburban cocoon of mindless consumption and complacent self-regard, abruptly ceased to exist at the beginning of this millennium.

(I'll wait while you wipe up after your spit take.)

Yup, no more mindless consumption and complacent self-regard in this country. Those days are behind us. We're consuming for Freedom now, motherfuckers.

Phew! Talk about setting a brisk pace. We've got to be halfway to Pompous Peak by now. Lead on, Ms. Stevens!

To truly appreciate Beavis and Butt-Head, you have to watch from a similar place, a Zen rock garden of peaceful imbecility. There's an almost Beckett-like purity to the tedium of Beavis and Butt-Head's serenely empty lives.

Wait wait wait! Not so fast! My lungs need time to adjust to the thinning air.

"Beckett"? What are you talking about? Butt-head, did you catch that?

"Huh huh. Uhhhhh-huh. She said 'bucket' you dumbass."

Oh, sorry.

OK, let's keep moving:

In light of later events like the Columbine school shootings, these debates seem worth revisiting. They're exactly the questions that Beavis and Butt-Head itself, in its indirect way, asks of its viewers: Is attributing the moral decay of a generation to the antics of these two snickering dill-weeds a classic case of mistaking the effect for the cause? Is our culture stupid because we watch TV, or do we watch TV because we're stupid?

Hmmmmmm. Is Dana Stevens a pompous mess because she writes for Slate? Or does she write for Slate because she's a pompous mess. Perhaps we'll find out when we reach the peak. I think I can see it from here:

Wonky animation used to signify outsider status.. now it signifies mainstream cool. In the same way, the boys' stupidity, which originally held up a cruel mirror to the MTV audience, was soon adopted as a model of behavior for, well, stupid people. Maybe it's only now that Beavis and Butt-Head are dead.. that they can be appreciated as the subversive sages they truly were.

Or not?

Damn you, Stevens, it's BEAVIS AND BUTT-HEAD!!! Can't you see that, in the act of attempting to divine depth, meaning, and cultural relevance in the show, you annihilate the very thing you seek. To be at one with the Boys is indeed akin to enlightenment, and like that elusive state it is not something that can be grasped after, much less discussed analytically. In your attempt to deconstruct their behavior, you betray them and... Hey! Beavis! Quit it, we're really close to the edge up here... HEY!!!

Aaaaaiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.............

"Huh huh. Put that on your 'blog', dude. Huh huh. Buh.. Log. Huh huh huh. Uh huh huh."

"Heh heh! Yeah! yeah! Aaaaaiiieee!"

"Huh huh. Bloggers like to work on their 'posts'. Huh huh huh..."


BRONCOS 27 - JETS 0

Something amazing happened yesterday afternoon. As Vinny Testaverde -- behind center again after Brooks Bollinger suffered a concussion in the first quarter -- bungled his way through another shockingly incompetent performance, my Jets Fan soul was freed from the Hell it had been inhabiting. The burden of hope having been lifted from my chest, I suddenly found myself in a Happy Place, a place where each successive fumble or interception was cause not for alarm, or agony, or a fit of swearing at the television, but for naught but a bemused, contented smile.

I reached Acceptance.

The Jets could quite possibly finish with the worst record in the NFL this year, and if they do, I will be fine with it. I will simply look forward to the Big Decision to be made in Spring of 2006: Matt Leinart or Reggie Bush. If the history of the franchise is any indication, you can be sure the Jets will make the wrong choice. But, hey, with those options, even the "wrong" choice could pan out pretty well, right? Oh, wait, I'm still talking about the Jets. Ha ha. I am silly.

In other news, the Colts roll on. Peyton and company are now just six games away from an undefeated regular season. Keep it going, guys. I so want to see Nick Buoniconti shove that bottle of champagne up his ass. That will be so sweet...


WEEKEND BEER BLOGGING

Picked up a six pack of Southern Tier Brewing Company's Old Man Winter Ale on Friday. A couple of weeks ago I tried Southern Tier's Fall sampler 12-pack, and I was sufficiently intrigued that I figured I'd give this new offering a try.

The executive summary: Very tasty beer, atrociously mis-labeled.

Winter ales are typically rich, thick, maybe a little spicy, and more towards the malty end of the spectrum than the hoppy side. What the boys in Lakewood, NY have created in their "Winter Ale" is nothing of the sort. It is, rather, a classic IPA, and a very good one at that. Light to medium body, crisp, and hopped like crazy. Seriously, this is a bitter, bitter beer, so if you're into that (I am) by all means run out and grab this brew.

Rating: 6.5


SCRIPT CHANGE

I realize that getting the beltway press to relinquish a cherished script is like prying a chew toy away from a crazed Rottweiler, but it's really high time they let go of the whole Bush and Cheney as Tough Guys thing. That particular carton of milk is past its expiration date. Way past it.

This month, bolstered no doubt by Bush's stale-piss-poor poll numbers, key Democrats have finally started to make some noise about the campaign of lies and deception that the administration used to con the country into supporting the Iraq war. It started with Harry "Blackjack" Reid's magnificent Rule 21 gambit, which put a national spotlight on the Senate's failure to ever follow up on their mandate to investigate how pre-war intelligence was used and abused by the White House. Following that, a growing chorus of Democratic voices has risen to publicly proclaim a simple truth: Bush and his minions distorted the record on Iraq, withheld key pieces of intelligence from Congress and the public, and shaped the available evidence to support a preconceived agenda of unprovoked invasion.

The White House, predictably, is throwing a full-on hissy. To which I say, fine, let 'em. Their mendacity is a matter of public record. They want to pick a fight about who said what when? Let's go.

But let's be clear about who is on the offensive here and who's fighting for their lives. Let's be clear about where the righteous anger is coming from and who's hiding behind self-serving spin. It's time for the media to wake the fuck up and smell the twin pantloads that Bush and Cheney are towing in their wakes.

Yesterday and today, practically every headline I've read has been about the White House hitting back. Dan Froomkin -- who I really like -- headlined yesterday's White House Briefing "Cheney Unleashed" and said the VP was "out for blood".

What the fuck world are the people who write this shit living in? Bush and Cheney and their congressional lackeys are puling and sniveling like a bunch of cowardly little shits. They're not in control of the discussion. They're not "on the offensive". These simpering, spoiled little brats are whining their hearts out about the Big, Bad Democrats actually calling them on their misdeeds. That's the new reality, OK? These pissants aren't striking fear into anyone anymore. The game's up. The nation has turned decidedly against these papier-mache bullies.

It is therefore time for the press to let go of a few mischaracterizations. Here, let me help:

Dick Cheney is not a pit bull. Dick Cheney is a third-rate bureaucrat who wanted to play a game of war and got in way the fuck over his head. Dick Cheney is incompetent. He's a fat little piglet who's suckled on the teat of the military-industrial complex his entire life. So stop painting a picture of him as the steely-eyed power player with the keen intellect. This guy is the pointy-haired boss gone wild. No principles, not much brains, and shrivelled little raisins for balls.

George Bush is neither a cowboy nor a pugilist. George Bush is a shit-scared Mama's Boy who hasn't got a shred of a clue what to do now that people have stopped blindly prostrating themselves before him. He's so desperate to return to the womb that the only people he's talking to these days are Mommy, Laura, Condi, and Karen. George Bush is freaking the fuck out. He doesn't need bullets for his six-shooter, he needs a bottle and a nap. I'd call Bush a pussy, but that would be a disservice to women everywhere, the vast majority of whom have a tougher spine and a deeper reserve of courage than this gutless puke. George Bush is a eunuch.

See how easy that was? There's your new script, D.C. media. Go to it.


STUPIDEST LETTER TO THE EDITOR EVER

This morning's Hartford Courant featured what was, quite possibly, the stupidest Letter to the Editor I have ever read. Not surprisingly, it was from a religious crazy weighing in on the paper's recent Intelligent Design Creationism vs. Evolution reporting. Here's how the writer, one Averyl O. Reed of West Hartford, starts off:

The Nov. 11 editorial "Keep Science, Faith Separate" stated that "mixing biology and religious belief in the classroom is a dangerous idea that cheats students of a sound scientific education based on observations, experiments and logical argument."

Who determines which arguments in the ongoing debate are the "logical" ones?

My mind might accept as logical something entirely opposite of the next mind lined up in this argument.

Now, in debates with Wingers of different stripes, I have occasionally been known to employ the put-down that my adversary wouldn't know a logical argument if it bit them on the ass. Before this morning, however, I don't think I ever realized just how true that could be. Reading that last sentence, I am convinced that if a logical argument were attacking Averyl Reed's ass -- snarling and drooling, its jaws locked in a death grip around bleeding buttock flesh -- Averyl would turn around and say "What's this? What are you? You look like an opinion to me. Begone! Release my ass, you vile bit of conjecture you!"

Seriously, Averyl, what are we going to do with you?

The entire point of logic is that it is a fixed system of rules for evaluating relationships between statements and determining the validity and soundness of arguments constructed from those statements. More specifically:

A deductive argument is said to be valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. Otherwise, a deductive argument is said to be invalid.

A deductive argument is sound if and only if it is both valid, and all of its premises are actually true. Otherwise, a deductive argument is unsound.

That may be too much for you to grasp all at once, Averyl, so here's the key thought to carry with you as you go along on your merry way: Logic is not subjective.

That means that if you believe that an argument or position -- let's call it "A" -- is illogical and I believe that "A" is logical, one of us, by the definition of "logic", is wrong. A "logical" examination of our premises and the statements we each make on the way to arriving at our conclusions will tell us which one of us that is. Capiche?

Now, let's continue with your letter:

I know the scientific minds have worked and studied for years with their microscopes, petri dishes, primordial swamps, fossils, DNA and so forth, and they always end up with something that's solid and logical to them. Most often it can be touched and felt, even though they may have had to create a model to make it so. They always start with something.

Actually, a great deal of progress in the scientific disciplines over the years has been made with the aid of "thought experiments". This is where someone reasons through something in their head and tries to figure out what the most likely outcome of a particular chain of events would be.

But that's probably not what you're talking about. So, yes, I'll stipulate that scientists usually start with "something" when they do an experiment. "Nothing" is very hard to deal with under laboratory conditions. Moving on:

My Bible tells me the creator started with absolutely nothing and built it all from scratch.

When are those on the other side of the argument going to create anything out of an empty petri dish?

Wait, your Bible tells you? And here I thought you wanted to talk about logic and science. My bad.

Look, I'm willing to be open minded here. The Bible's the word of God, right? So God told you that he started with absolutely nothing and created the universe "from scratch" -- Isn't that just so homey? "From scratch"? Can't you just see God with a big ole' apron on, rummaging through his cabinet looking for just the right ingredients for a universe? "Hmmmm. I know I picked up some Carbon 12 at the store yesterday. Where could it be?" -- OK, fine.

Scientifically speaking, that's a rather bold claim. So here's what I'll be expecting from God:

1. A detailed description of his methodology;

2. A discussion of expected results versus observed results vis-a-vis His universe-creation exercise;

3. Instructions on how to repeat and thus independently verify His work.

Shouldn't be too high a bar for the Big Guy to clear. Mortal scientists do it every day.

So there you go. Thank you, Averyl Reed, for reminding us, yet again, of the key lesson to be learned from the Intelligent Design Creationism vs. Evolution debate: Faith and reason don't mix.


BOOMERS GOIN' BUH-BYE!

OK, this is a funny coincidence. Mere days after my post ripping Ameriprise for kissing up to the Baby Boom generation, Jack Shafer at Slate has an article examining the waning influence of Boomers on popular culture and the media (italics mine):

By sheer force of numbers, boomers quickly toppled the martini-drinking, WW II generation and substituted their cultural references. In recent years they've repelled the next generations—let's call them the post-boomers for lack of a satisfying rubric that encompasses Gens X, Y, and Z—from taking cultural control.

That's not to say boomers have locked out the post-boomer sensibility. Quite to the contrary -- they've co-opted post-boomer references to maintain their position. For instance, Madison Avenue boomers happily mashed up the generations that came before and after them with that Lee Iacocca -- Snoop Dogg Chrysler commercial, which alerted everybody in the nation to izzle-speak. But the cultural frame of reference -- the odd couple of the duffer meets the ghetto-slangster -- remains distinctly boomer.

Demographics should dictate how long boomer cultural hegemony will hold on. While still the largest single generation, the boomers are steadily dying off—or at least going to pasture. They peaked as a percentage of the population in 1980 at 35 percent and currently stand at about 27 percent, or 77 million self-absorbed individuals. But sooner or later, the post-boomers will give them the necessary nudge, push, and shove to sweep their rotting culture from the scene, and references to Beatles tracks will become as irrelevant as references to Mills Brothers songs.

Shafer goes on to explore what sorts of cultural references and signifiers will alert us to the moment when the Baby Boom officially cedes the spotlight. Examples include quotes from movies and TV shows with a post-Boomer focus, video-game speak, internet slang, etc.

He also includes hip-hop references in this list of generational boundary markers. That one I have to take issue with. While I seriously doubt there are many Boomers out there who genuinely enjoy rap, they -- or at least the marketers in their midst -- seem to have zeroed in on hip-hop culture as a way to ironically juxtapose the intrinsic un-hip-ness of late middle age with youth-oriented coolness. In jiu-jitsu-like fashion, they thereby take onto themselves some of that same coolness by simple virtue of their self-awareness of its absence. (Or so they hope.) Take the Lee Iacocca golfing with Snoop Dogg commercial that Shafer cites. Or, for that matter, take any of the 500 commercials that have come out in the last year that feature some geeky, whitebread schlepp doing "The Robot" -- a dance which was last considered cool in 1985 when I owned my Adidas jacket and my Pumas with the fat laces in 'em. (BTW: If I see one more ad like this I'm going to fucking kill somebody. I used to rock at the Robot back in my break-dancing days, and now it's become a goddamned punchline. And, no, I'm not kidding. I used to break dance. Me and my crew were the original white, suburban, middle-class hip-hop fans. We were the template which all the pale copies infesting the malls of America today sadly try to emulate. Posers.) Anyhow, my point is just that hip-hop has already permeated our culture to the point where its signifiers can't really be used to confuse and befuddle Boomers, thus helping to ostracize them from the cultural Halls of Influence.

One more thing: Contra Mr. Shafer's suggestion, I absolutely refuse to see Generation X subsumed under the more vague label of "post Boomer". First, I will not see us defined as simply That Which Came After the Boomers. Second, those of us who came of age during the Hair Metal Era and the heyday of MTV are culturally quite distinct from the baggy-clothes-wearin', skateboard-toting, faux-alienated wanna-be punks who came after us. Those would be the Boomers' kids, of course...


WHAT'S IN YOUR MAILBOX?

I'm going through the mail last night, and there's an 8.5" x 11" padded envelope in there from Crapitol One, they of the increasingly tired "Vikings Are Coming To Get You Because Your Credit Card Charges Too Many Fees" ad campaign. I'm like, OK, I don't have an account with these people, so what could they possibly be sending me that might merit this level of packaging? I open it up, and inside is a credit card offer. Same as any other credit card offer. Couple of folded sheets of letter-sized paper and a business-reply envelope. Could have easily fit into a standard envelope.

So, Crapitol One: Why? Why did you feel the need to send this trashcan filler to me in bubble wrap? Was someone in marketing actually afraid that your offer would be damaged in transit? Do you enjoy gratuitously depleting the world's oil supply on top of helping to kill off our old-growth forests? Or was this just another shameless bid to do what every advertiser on the planet seems fixated on doing: Grabbing my attention?

Well, I'm sorry, but the bubble-wrap mailer gambit didn't get it done. You want to separate yourself from the pack? Next time send me your offer on a stone fuckin' tablet. Then I'll think about it. Punks.


WELL, WELL, WELL

Turns out Dick Cheney's Super-Secret Energy Commission really was just a Big Oil Fiesta after all:

A White House document shows that executives from big oil companies met with Vice President Cheney's energy task force in 2001 -- something long suspected by environmentalists but denied as recently as last week by industry officials testifying before Congress.

The document, obtained this week by The Washington Post, shows that officials from Exxon Mobil Corp., Conoco (before its merger with Phillips), Shell Oil Co. and BP America Inc. met in the White House complex with the Cheney aides who were developing a national energy policy, parts of which became law and parts of which are still being debated.

Who ever would have thunk it?

Not good times for Big Dick. The mask, such as it was, is really rotting and falling away, revealing the corrupt, paranoid plutocrat that those of us in the neither-insane-nor-stupid neck of the political woods have known was there all along. I just hope the media barbecues him over this to the extent he deserves. If nothing else, it could be wildly entertaining seeing him squirm a bit.


THE BOOK SIGNING. (WITHOUT JOKES)

Last night, Tracy, my friend Erik and I went to a book signing by Al Franken for his new book The Truth (With Jokes). I've read Franken's last two books, and I'm looking forward to reading this new one. He's got a gift for making you crack up while also making astute, honest, insightful observations.

Funny thing was, at the signing, Franken wasn't very funny. Yeah, sure, he got a couple of good zingers in, but by and large his tone cycled between anger, frustration, sadness, and fatigue. This is certainly understandable in anyone whose job description is basically "Bush Administration Critic", but still, I was surprised. It might've just been the physical and psychological grind of doing a book tour. That could explain why he broke down repeatedly while discussing his father, who died of lung cancer over a decade ago. (Possibly the oddest moment of levity was when he started to tear up for, like, the fifth time in an hour and he stopped himself and said "Come on, Franken, it was 13 years ago. Get over it!") Or maybe it's the accumulated effects of several years spent shouting to be heard over the right-wing noise machine. Take your pick.

In any event, he was an interesting and personally disarming speaker. I can see why he frequently goes to events where he has to debate wingers or to places where he might otherwise face an unsympathetic crowd: He has an easy-going, matter-of-fact nature that puts an audience at ease. What Franken's bearing, tone, and gestures seemed to say as he was speaking was "Look, I'm not your enemy, I just want to talk like two reasonable people, OK? Come on." Not belligerent at all. Kind of like the Anti-O'Reilly.

Anyhow, it was a good talk, and he signed our copy of The Truth, which I'll be getting to soon.


ATTENDING TO MY NEEDS

Kate at A Cat And Twenty propagates an inanely entertaining meme: Google your name and the word "needs". (Note: You need to put quotes around it so only the exact phrase is returned.) Here's a sampling of my results for "Toast needs":

"Toast needs to be the OSX version, the OS9 version will not work through classic."

"The toast needs buttered every 108 minutes. Here is the butter I use."

That one appears to have something to do with Lost.

"With all the maple syrup, I really don't think French toast needs extra sugar."

Oui.

"Toast needs an extra bit of lift at the end to save your fingers getting burnt..."

"The toast needs to be toasting while the sausages are frying."

"Toast needs a 6-foot fence since he is a great jumper."

True. I do have mad hops.

"Your second round of toast needs less time."

That's from a page titled "Making toast, the most perfect and wonderful toast that can be..."

"Gov. Toast needs to be dumped."

Damn!!! I haven't even declared my candidacy yet.

"Toast needs to move a lot of data without delay"

Um... Not recently.


STUPID SHIT THAT ANNOYS ME - ITEM 11

In the restrooms at work we have paper towel dispensers with a lever on the front that you press down to advance the roll. You get about 6 inches of towel for each press of the lever. I usually go with 4-6 presses, but that's not the issue. The issue is how one depresses the lever.

See, I find that the "firm and controlled" approach generally gets the job done. There are a bunch of guys who use the same restroom as me, however, who for some reason feel the need to attack the paper towel machine. They grasp the lever and then violently rip it up and down at high speed about a dozen times. This creates a loud noise -- which of course annoys the crap out of me -- but what grates on me more is the sheer gratuitousness of it. The thing works just fine if you use it normally, and yet these numbnutses seem to feel the need to unleash all their pent up rage against it, you know? Like they've got to show that paper towel dispenser who's boss.

Morons. It's no wonder the lever breaks off 3-4 times a year.


PANTHERS 30 - JETS 3

Don't even want to talk about it. I contacted the Jets front office yesterday to ask if Tracy and I could be assigned to a foster team while the Jets sort things out. Preferably the Colts.


CHARLIE?!

The Toronto Raptors took a lot of crap over the Summer for grabbing UConn forward Charlie Villanueva with the seventh overall pick in this year's draft. The consensus was that Villanueva went way too high, based primarily on the criticisms that a.) His game was too raw for the pros and b.) He had a shitty work ethic.

Well, Charlie didn't take too kindly to the naysayers and he's set out to prove them wrong.

And right.

By leading all rookies in pre-season scoring and busting out of the gate strong in the early going -- including a performance this weekend where he dropped 26 points and 12 rebounds on the New York Bricks -- Villanueva has proven conclusively that he never actually played to anywhere near his potential when he was at Connecticut. Trust me: I watched damn near every game he played for the Huskies, and he did nothing that even hinted at this caliber of play.

So.

On the one hand, good for you, Charlie. I hope you have a great career.

On the other hand, thanks for jerking UConn fans around for two years. If you just weren't interested in playing college ball -- and clearly you weren't -- you should have cashed in and gone pro right from high school and saved us all the trouble of waiting in vain for your talent to blossom in the (for you) fallow ground of Storrs, Connecticut.


HABEUS DICKWADUS?

WASHINGTON D.C. (AP) - Senate Republicans, aided by a handful of key Democrats, furthered the cause of oppression, tyranny, and evil today...

Doesn't it seem that stories like that have been coming across the wire on a daily basis now for, oh, say, five years or so? And as surely as you know, the moment you scan the page, that the GOP has struck another blow against humanity, you also know that Joe Lieberman was one of the turncoat Democrats helping them to shove the dagger in. It's just a foregone conclusion.

I despise this man. I truly do. The unctuous, whiny tone of his voice. The ostentatious piety. The mild-mannered mask he wears as he goes about the business of undermining his party. This man represents my state -- my beautiful blue state -- and he's just an abomination, a disgrace to Connecticut and to the Democratic Party.

Lieberman's latest betrayal was his support of the GOP's move to deny the detainees in Guantánamo the right to take their cases before the United States judicial system on habeas corpus grounds:

For almost eight centuries the ''great writ'' of habeas corpus has been a bedrock principle of English and American law, from the Magna Carta to today's jails and courts. It's the means for a prisoner to contest his imprisonment before a judge.

That's one reason legal experts were stunned when the Senate, after an hour of debate and no hearings, voted Thursday to adopt a measure that, if it becomes law, would overturn the Supreme Court's extension of habeas corpus protection to 500-plus detainees at the Guantánamo Bay naval base in Cuba.

Stunned indeed. Even after years of seeing outrage piled upon outrage, this defiant middle finger to the nation's highest court has to be considered pretty heady stuff. "TERROR!" the Senators cried, as they fed the Constitution into the shredder. "BE AFRAID!" they shouted as they wiped their asses with the pages of the Supreme Court's written decision.

Asked to defend his indefensible vote, Lieberman responded:

"A foreign national who is captured and determined to be an enemy combatant in the world war on terrorism has no more right to a habeas corpus appeal to our courts than did a captured soldier of the Axis powers during World War II."

This is an artless dodge, even by the Chinless Wonder's bottom-of-the-barrel standards. I love the way he rolls the term "enemy combatant" off of his tongue as if it has any validity outside the fevered fantasies of Alberto Gonzales. This shiny new category of human being -- untainted by any troublesome rights whatsoever -- is a fake designation dredged up mere years ago by the Bushies for their fake war on a noun. Yet Lieberman, having gone all-in with these criminals, casually drops it into his explanation as if it excused him.

The difference between a captured soldier in WWII and the prisoners at Guantánamo is quite simple to grasp: The former, as uniformed soldiers, had a nation state advocating for them, negotiating for their release. The latter have no advocates. No one speaks for them. They could sit and rot for all eternity down there in their cells because we -- the United States of America -- have exiled them to the vacuum beyond the concentric spheres of both national and international law. While their bodies remain visible to us, as legal entities they have been "disappeared".

If the courts do not act -- again -- to right this wrong, then this may well be the most lasting scar of the Bush Years: The creation of a category of individuals with no rights whatsoever under the law.

And I will have to live with the knowledge that my voice in the Senate -- a man that I voted for in 2000 -- aided and abetted the tyrants in their crime.

You're a goddamned disgrace, Mr. Senator.


WEEKEND BEER BLOGGING

Magic Hat debuted their 2005 winter seasonal brew, Saint Gootz, a couple of weeks ago. The label identifies it as a "dark wheat ale", and like most wheats it's got a nice, tangy zip to it. As a dark ale, however, it's got a lot more body than, say, a summer wheat. Nice, deep, smooth feel to it. Great flavor. No bitterness at all, so you hop-o-phobes out there can enjoy it. Once again, the beer wizards at Magic Hat come through with a winner.

Rating: 8





THE JOY OF YARDWORK

Perfect Fall day here in Connecticut.

After two and a half months of weekend commitments, Tracy and I finally get a couple of days to catch up on some things around the homestead.

Hey, wait a second: Nobody told me you had to clean the gutters on a house. What's that all about?

After a blistering hour of raking, Tracy decided we needed a leaf blower. Off to Home Depot we went...

Check this out: It blows and it sucks! Kinda like the Bush Administration...


WOO HOO!!!

I'm going to live forever!!!


AMERIPRISE: WE KISS BOOMER ASS!

OK, I have to take a moment to vent about Ameriprise's unbelievably annoying ad campaign. You've seen these if you watch football on Sunday at all. The first one went more-or-less like this (um, loosely paraphrasing):

"You were the generation that changed the world."

[Footage of crazy hippies protesting and going to concerts]

"You were wild and crazy and great and you never let anything stop you."

[Picture of four young people standing outside old VW mini-bus]

"And you still don't..."

[Picture of four fifty-something people standing outside new VW mini-bus]

"At Ameriprise, we know aging, insecure Boomers have mad cash, so we're willing to give your egos a big, sloppy rim job..."

This fucking thing has been annoying me for weeks, and now they've got a new one:

[Sixty-ish foursome standing on cliff overlooking ocean while crappy sixties song plays in background]

"You're bold. You're different. You're redefining retirement. Blah blah blah. Invest with Ameriprise. (slurp)"

I'm sorry, I can't fucking take this shit. Like all Gen-X'ers, I've lived my entire life in the shadow of these freaks. I had their fuckin' music forced down my throat 24-7 for years. I had to endure endless stories about the stupid friggin' 60's from my elders at college. I've had to sit and watch as every fucking life stage the Baby Boom went through was serially celebrated as the be-all, end-all of life on this planet.

Now this? I think not.

Here's my suggestion for Ameriprise's next ad:

[Woodstock footage]

Man, you sure did tear shit up when you were young...

[Cut to stock ticker]

Then you grew up and sold out! You bought into the System, dude...

[Suburban scene, outside of McMansion, Hummer in foreground]

You struggled mightily to preserve the illusion that you were interesting and different...

[Shot of wrinkled sixty-something guy falling off surfboard]

But you weren't! You were just obnoxious, over-bearing, and self-absorbed!

...And now you're OLD, dude!

[Footage of middle-aged kids walking boomer parent into nursing home]

Harsh.

[Boomer taking out dentures, looking in mirror, fingering age spot on face]

Pretty soon, YOU'RE GONNA DIE!

[Show casket sitting by altar]

At Ameriprise, we're here to help escort you towards that Great Woodstock in the Sky. Invest with us! We'll kiss your fat, wrinkled ass like there's no tomorrow. Because who knows? For you, there might not be!

(sigh)

Hey, I can dream...


O'REILLY

Via Atrios, this reaction to Bill O'Reilly's obscene suggestion that we let terrorists destroy San Francisco because of a decision by that city to not allow military recruiters on local campuses:

Not everybody took Fox News host Bill O'Reilly's on-air comments this week about terrorists bombing Coit Tower as the hyperbole that fills the talk-radio ether. One of the ticked off was San Francisco Supervisor Chris Daly, who Friday called for O'Reilly to be fired.

"For an anchor on a major station, Fox News, to be saying those kinds of things, it's just not OK," Daly said Friday. "It was just over the top."

Agreeing with Daly was San Francisco firefighters union president John Hanley...

"Who is this guy, O'Reilly?" said Hanley, who identified himself as both a third-generation San Franciscan and military veteran. "I've got guys fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm a veteran myself. What's he talking about?"

You know what? When Bill Maher committed the faux pas of suggesting that the 9-11 terrorists were not "cowards", he got canned. How about we get O'Reilly fired for this? How dare this pompous, More-Patriotic-Than-Thou, posturing piece of shit use his bully pulpit -- and never has that term been more appropriate -- to condone the killing of his fellow citizens over a policy decision he disagrees with? If that is not a firing offense, I don't know what is.

E-mail Fox News and tell them enough is enough. Bill O'Reilly must go.


FUCK YOU, MONKEY

From the Times: Bush Contends Partisan Critics Hurt War Effort.

So that's the core theme of Bush's Big Speech yesterday? The idiotic, recycled claim that critics of the war are undermining the troops? Excuse me while I yawn.

You know what really undermines our military? Presidents who lie in order to take us into unnecessary wars.


KANSAS

Scanning the headlines on my news reader this morning, I ran across this item, which immediately filled me with a mix of pity and contempt:

Evolution Suffers Kansas Setback

Ah... No. I don't think so.

Evolution does not suffer setbacks. Evolution doesn't "care" what a small band of narrow-minded, willfully-ignorant domesticated primates in one backwater state in one screwed up country think about it one way or the other. Unlike the incorporeal, anthropomorphic deities so many people persist in believing in, evolution has no purported "interests". It doesn't have "goals" or "desires" of any kind. It is a blind, impersonal, natural process. It is also an undeniable feature of life on this planet. Evolution is real, whether the rubes on the Kansas School Board like it or not, and that's that.

Evolution didn't suffer a setback today. Kansas schoolchildren did.


DAAA, NA NA NUH... IT'S OVER.

Let it be known that at 12:11 AM Eastern Standard Time on November 8, 2005, the Patriots Era was officially pronounced dead.


BEN

About six, maybe seven years ago, I was coming in to work a little late at the software shop that my buddy Fridge and I worked at. As I passed by his desk, he ripped his headphones off and, with an evangelical intensity in his voice, said "Dude, you have to listen to this CD. It's fucking awesome. I'm on my third listen already this morning." So it was that, later that day, I found myself listening to Whatever And Ever, Amen for the first time. I was... intrigued. Here's this guy with a high-pitched, sorta whiny voice banging the living shit out of a piano and singing about a geeky guy getting his revenge on the world ("One Angry Dwarf and 200 Solemn Faces"). Was this a novelty album? But, wait, just two tracks later, a haunting song about a guy and his girlfriend going through some sort of medical trauma together ("Brick" -- probably Folds' most famous song). I didn't know quite what to think, where to put this guy in my musical universe, but I kept coming back. For the next couple of weeks, on a pretty much daily basis, I found myself heading over to Fridge's cube to borrow what I referred to as the "Angry Dwarf" CD.

Three albums and half a decade later, it's safe to say that Ben Folds is one of my favorite artists alive today.

With each album, Folds has moved further away from the college-bar-friendly wise-assery of "Dwarf" and towards the more introspective, soul-baring, emotion-wrenching style of "Brick". This has worked for me. When my first marriage was falling apart and my life seemed like a complete mess, he was there with (appropriately enough) "Mess". When, after learning the lessons of the heart the hard way, I found my One True Love, he was there with "The Luckiest", a song that brings tears of joy to myself and Mrs. Toast every time we hear it. Folds' remarkable ability to tell the stories that so many of us have lived through, yet do it in a way that it feels like he's mind-melding with you, personally, is the true mark of his brilliance.

Having given you this background, you'll understand that I had pretty high hopes as Tracy and I headed into the Orpheum Theater in Boston last night.

I was not disappointed. Ben was awesome.

But before I tell you about that, let's set the stage a bit.

You know how I said yesterday that the last show I saw at the Orpheum was Motley Crue? That was in 1985. I don't think they've cleaned the place since. Seriously, we're walking into the lobby and Tracy gets a bad case of pucker face. "This place is kinda gross. It smells horrible in here. Moldy." Indeed, my affection for the venue aside, my wife's senses could not be refuted. The olfactory shortcomings of the environment were enhanced by a general state of disrepair. Peeling paint, loose seat backs, that sort of thing. Surely, though, the wondrous acoustics I'd remembered would still be in play, right? Well... not so much. For all the shows I'd seen there previously, I'd been in the upper balcony. This time, we were in the "orchestra" section -- basically the entire first floor -- in row Z. The last row. The very last row. Above us was the oval-shaped opening of the second-floor lobby. In front of that was a very low ceiling which stretched on for some thirty feet before things opened up into the main portion of the auditorium. Not what you'd call the best acoustic conditions.

Oh well. We still had a decent view of the stage since the Orpheum simply isn't that large. So that was a good thing.

Until the 6'5' guy walked in and plopped down two rows in front of us. Splendid.

The show had one and a half opening acts. The first was a woman named Christine Baze who is doing this thing called the Yellow Umbrella Tour to raise awareness about cervical cancer, which she is a survivor of. Heartwarming and inspiring story. Yah. The five-minute lecture video on the HPV virus at the start of her set, however, was frankly grating (Tracy pointed this out first, so it wasn't just me being Impatient Concert Curmudgeon). Oh, and her music sucks ass.

The "real" opening act was a band called The Fray, and they were a pleasant surprise. In the interest of full disclosure, I should say that I'm not a big "opening act" guy. I don't go to a lot of concerts, and when I do I'm pretty much focused on seeing the band I know and like and paid for and hauled my ass out to see. Opening acts are generally a nuisance -- an unwanted and overly drawn-out act of foreplay forced upon an audience with no alternative but to wait patiently for the Main Event.

The Fray, though... They were pretty good. I found myself liking them. They aim squarely for the "Earnest, Middle-of-the-Road, Straight-Ahead Rock" vibe. This is a pretty oversaturated neighborhood these days, and not a sound I have a natural affinity for like, say, hair metal. So the bar is high. Last band with this kind of sound I was really into was the BoDeans, and that was over a decade ago. But anyhow, The Fray rocked. They were tight, they played their hearts out, and their songs managed to rise above the general blandness generated by similar groups. I'd actually consider buying one of their albums. They were that enjoyable.

And still, I was glad to see them go, because they were the last thing between me and Mr. Folds.

At about 9:15 PM, they started flashing the lights to get people back to their seats. Then they waited another ten minutes just to fuck with my head. Tracy turns and sees me sitting there bolt-upright, bug-eyed, practically vibrating, and she just starts cracking up.

Finally, at 9:30 PM, the lights go down. Colored spots flood the stage, changing hue in rapid succession, while an intense symphonic piece plays in the background, and then... and then... and then that keeps happening for a couple minutes. I'm like, Ben, dude, stop fucking around.

Then he took to the stage, assumed his customary sprinter-like stance, leaning into the piano, and began a rendition of "Bastard", the opener from Songs for Silverman. Woo hoo! All right, let's go! Woo... Hey, is he singing? I can't hear him. Oh, hey, nice job, Mr. Mixer Board Guy, thanks for showing up. And why don't you see if you can find the piano on that board of yours. I hear Ben's good with that thing.

Yep, it took the sound crew about three full songs before they finally got everything mixed just about right. Go figure. Maybe the Orpheum is a hard place to mix for. I don't remember Crue or Ratt or Twisted Sister having a problem, but hey.

In any event, right about the time the mixing guys got their shit together, Ben and the band hit their stride. The early part of the show was heavily skewed towards Ben's last two solo albums. In addition to the opener, we were treated to "Trusted" and "You To Thank" from Silverman as well as "Gone", "Annie Waits", and "Still Fighting It" from Rockin' The Suburbs.

The highlight of the early going was "Jesusland". Both of them. Having played the song once straight up, Ben paused and then lamented how he wasn't able to sell his label on releasing it as a single because it wasn't "radio friendly" enough. This segued into a rousing reinterpretation of the song that incorporated arena-rock flourishes reminiscent of U2 -- building up an Edge-like filigree at the top end of the keyboard before plunging into the first verse -- and Springsteen -- the heavy pause before panting out "JEE-susland" in the chorus . Strangely enough, this worked both as satire and as a legitimate "cover" of his own song.

By now, Ben was seriously loosening up. Moving into improv mode, he treated us to a few short snippets of songs that were, as he put it, "half baked" -- just stuff the band had been screwing around with on tour -- a piano riff or two with Ben singing New York Times headlines in lieu of vocals. And then we got something that has been, unbeknownst to me, a Folds staple for some time: A cover of Dr. Dre's "Bitches Ain't Shit". Yes, seriously. I actually think Tracy and I were the only two people in the audience who weren't expecting this, because the audience was doing the chorus from the second he started it up. Gangsta rap and a little soulful piano. A marriage whose time has come.

Having played up until this point with the accompaniment of a bassist and drummer, Ben moved into the next phase of the show by dismissing his companions and going solo (Mrs. Toast: "That was awesome"). This part of the set included "Don't Change Your Plans" from Messner and "Brick". It also featured "The Luckiest", thus relieving the apprehension that Tracy and I were feeling that he might overlook "our" Ben Folds song. (For the record, Tracy cried. I just brimmed. OK, I might have had a drop. Or two.)

After bringing the band back, Ben wound things up with "Army" and an incredibly powerful rendition of "Narcolepsy". During the former, Ben actually did something I was beginning to think was impossible: He engaged everyone in an audience participation bit that not only wasn't tedious, it was cool as hell and it served a musical purpose. See, there's a harmonized horn segment towards the end of "Army", but Ben doesn't travel with a horn section or a string section or whatnot, and he would never stoop to using recorded backup material. So instead, he broke the audience in half and had each half take part of the harmony and do it a capella style ("ba-da-baaaa", "buh-duh-da", "ba-da-da-DA-daaaaa"). It worked beautifully. Pleasure to take part in.

For the encore, we got "Zak And Sara" from Suburbs and, yes, my first Ben Folds tune ever, "One Angry Dwarf". Perfect ending.

I'd wondered, heading into this, what Ben's demeanor would be like on stage, how much he'd interact with the audience, whether he'd stick to doing his set by the numbers or bust out a bit. Well, the man knows how to do a show. He hit just the right note on every possible score. Balanced the mix of material between new stuff and old, threw in just enough curve balls that things never felt "rote", and managed to connect with the audience without being overbearing. All in all, it was a hell of a show. Next time he's in the region, we'll be sure to catch him again.


CHARGERS 31 - JETS 26

Forty minutes ago, I was jumping around my living room shouting:

"B! R! O! O! K! S! BROOKS! BROOKS! BROOKS!"

Now I am sitting on my couch sulking, wondering if anyone out there in Jets Nation has a Herm Edwards voodoo doll I can pick up cheap.

What a fucking... ARRRRRGHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! ... (sigh)

Down 5 points -- should have been down 4 except for an inexplicably bone-headed, if ultimately inconsequential, decision by Herm to go for two on the previous possession -- it's 1st and goal from the 3, about a minute and change left in the game: What do you do? Do you A.) Smash the ball in with your sure-thing Hall of Fame running back, or do you B.) Let your wide-eyed, fresh-from-the-nursery QB take three shots at the end zone? Most people, I'm guessing, go with A. But if you're Herm "Dumb-As-A-Fucking-Post" Edwards, of course, you go B.

Astonishingly, Herm the Ever-Smiling Twit actually had the sense to hand the ball to Bollinger in the second half, after Testaverde got sacked for the 800th time since his ill-advised return from retirement. This decision probably came two or three games too late to save the season -- even in the putrid AFC East -- but, hey, better late than never. For his part, Bollinger responded by leading the team on consecutive scoring drives, getting us almost all the way to the promised land. He could not, however, find an open man in the end zone for the game winner. Not his fault. Herm's fault for going 3 of 4 with the pass in a clear run situation.

I don't want to hear any shit about moral victories or good losses, either. The Jets could have won this game. It was there for the taking. Instead they fall to 2-and-6, ever closer to being consigned to the Matt Leinart Sweepstakes.

Fucking Edwards.


A FEW RAMBLINGS BEFORE I RAMBLE

Sorry for the unplanned blogging stoppage this week. Been kinda busy and all of a sudden I look up and it's like, whoa, the weekend's here already! Anyhow, Tracy and I are off to Boston in a little bit to catch the amazing Mr. Ben Folds at the Orpheum, and I wanted to check in before we hit the road. (BTW, I cannot imagine a better place to see Ben perform -- the acoustics at the Orpheum are simply incredible. 'Course, the last time I was there it was to see Motley Crue. I imagine this will be a somewhat different experience.)

Not too much to say at the moment about the horrifying-yet-predictable Alito nomination. Just as I figured, Bush went with a "strict-constructionist" fruitcake. Great news for everyone who wants to put that meddlesome federal government back in its place and let our rich and powerful corporate overlords get back to crushing everyone underfoot like God (and the founding fathers) intended. Yippee. Unfortunately for those of us who prefer living in, you know, "America", Alito's the Almond Joy of judges: Nutty on the inside but smooth and sweet on the outside. That makes the prospects for a sustainable filibuster somewhat grim.

Oh well. Reproductive freedom? Privacy? Civil Liberties? Workplace safety? A clean environment?

All overrated.

In other news, Harry Reid strapped on the stunt testicles this week and pimp-slapped Bill Frist and his gang of GOP tools in the Senate. Rule Twenty One, baby! Who saw that coming? I propose that we nickname our man Harry "Blackjack" from this point forward. Just a masterful move. And it is about fucking time the Senate was forced to stare the Bush administration's Iraq mendacity in the face. Take a nice, long look, gentlemen, and then get on the phone to Home Depot's contractor desk, because you're gonna need a fucking truckload of white-wash for that shit.

Elsewhere, Scooter began the quest to "clear his good name" of those awful charges brought by that nasty bully Patrick Fitzgerald. Hey, Scooter, here's a tip: You don't have a good name to clear, you lying, conniving, traitorous boot-lick. But, by all means, please go right ahead and plead "not guilty". I'm lovin' the prospect of a nice, long, leisurely trial. The better to expose your White House bosses, my dear man.

Ah, yes, just another week in George Bush's America, where the fun and games never end.

Very well, then. I am off to enjoy a splendidly warm and beautiful autumn day with my splendidly warm and beautiful wife. We shall walk the streets of Boston, dine at an as-yet-to-be-decided-upon fine dining establishment, perhaps drain a pint or two of ale, and then off to hear Mr. Folds dazzle us with some piano magic. I hope you all have an equally glorious day.



e-mail Toast


--BLOG BUTTER--
Emphasis Added
Shakespeare's Sister
Hornswaggler
The All Spin Zone
Smart Patrol
A Cat And Twenty
Laughing Wild
Upon Further Review
Some Watery Thoughts
The Disgruntled Chemist
The Vidiot
The Sideshow


What's Toast Reading for
Non-Fiction These Days?

Gang Green: An Irreverent Look Behind the Scenes at Thirty-eight (Well, Thirty-seven) Seasons of New York Jets Football Futility

Gang Green:
An Irreverent Look Behind the Scenes at Thirty-eight (Well, Thirty-seven) Seasons of New York Jets Football Futility


--BLOG ROLL--
Frogs And Ravens
Thought Mechanics
David Rees
Rude Pundit
James Wolcott
The Poor Man
Political Animal
Eschaton
Clusterfuck Nation
Pharyngula
Hullabaloo
Ezra Klein
The Daily Howler
AmericaBlog
New Donkey
Orcinus
Altercation
Talking Points Memo
TPM Cafe
Liberal Oasis

--HEALTH CARE--
The Health Care Blog
The Healthcare IT Guy


What's Toast Reading for
Fiction These Days?

Scanner Darkly

A Scanner Darkly


--POLITICS--
White House Briefing
BartCop
BuzzFlash
CJR Campaign Desk
Salon.com War Room
Media Matters

--NEWS & OPINION--
Tom Paine
Salon
The Nation
The New Republic
The American Prospect
Arts & Letters Daily

--SITES I LIKE--
MNFTIU
Robert Anton Wilson
Flying Spaghetti Monsterism
General Semantics
BrainyQuote
Maddox
ScoobyTuner
Ale Street News
Internet Scrabble Club

--ACTIVISM--
Americans United
Amnesty International
ACLU
MoveOn


--SPORTS--
Sports Guy
King Kaufman
RotoWire
New York Post
Portland Oregonian


--ARCHIVES--
October 2005
September 2005
July-Aug 2005
June 2005
May 2005
Mar-Apr 2005
Jan-Feb 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
Aug-Sep 2004
July 2004
June 2004
Mar-May 2004
February 2004
January 2004
Nov-Dec 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
Old Sports


Toast's Long-Term
Reading Projects

History of Western Philosophy

History of Western Philosophy



A People's History of the United States: 1492-Present

A People's History of the United States



TwoGlasses Store
Toast's Lists!
BUY BLUE!!!